There seems an obvious advantage in giving warehouse dimensions and facts their own schema (dim, fact); but it might be more imagined than real.  I have started using this separation; it allows the dim table prefix to be dropped which makes lists and auto-naming neater later on in the development pipeline; I’ll see how it goes.

I use Rep for reporting objects (views or procedures that drive reports).  That might be too cryptic for good naming, although giving it a description (MS_Description) property helps.  I tried to keep schemas to two or three characters.  I have just come across joethebusinessintelligenceguy who unambiguously uses the complete word report for the reports schema and I warm to the idea.

Joe has some other nice ideas: olap for SSAS objects and etl for SSIS loader objects.

Those Schemas in Full